Wednesday, 21 October 2026

The same old flaws

I love reading, but I get annoyed seeing the same old flaws over and over again. Why aren’t editors picking them up? For example:

 ·        Endings that leave half a dozen plot strands unresolved. I mean, what happened to Wendy? Did she finally leave Tom or did they kiss and make up? And what about Sophie? Did she ever kick her heroin habit?
·         A constant parade of uninteresting minor characters who're instantly forgettable and add nothing to the plot. Why not leave them all out?
·         A plot so complex and full of twists and turns that it's impossible to keep track if you have a poor memory and an IQ less than 250.
·         A pretentious writing style that equates obscure words and references with literary merit and equates simplicity with lack of imagination.
·         Numerous flash-forwards and flash-backs that leave me thoroughly confused and wondering which day or year or century we're currently in.
·         Stories told by several different narrators which never quite come together and leave gaping holes in the plot that nobody ever explains.
·         A book that would have been perfect at 300 pages, but the author thought it needed another 200 pages to do justice to their literary brilliance.
·         Amazing coincidences and lucky breaks that miraculously save a character from a sticky end. A £50,000 inheritance from a long-forgotten aunt or the sudden discovery of an identical twin sister living in Sidcup.

But despite all the flaws, I always have a book on the go and plenty more ready to be read. A few flaws won’t stop me.

18 comments:

  1. I would add those who introduce an item in chapter one we never see again. Why did they describe it to us in the first place?
    Linda

    ReplyDelete
  2. I dislike too many characters, especially when none have unique names.
    I have had to DNF a number of books recently due to their obnoxious content. Characters who use the F word in every conversation is just a lack of imagination, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bijoux: I agree, the F word is used far too often. There used to be a much bigger range of swearwords when I was a kid.

      Delete
    2. Or when the names are so similar I have trouble remembering which is which. Steve and Stu, Joan and Jane; really?!

      Delete
    3. Anon: Me too. Sometimes different people even have the same first name, which is ridiculous.

      Delete
  3. I love reading. I do gravitate to non fiction, history & other various topics as I am curious & eager to learn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paula: I mostly read fiction, but with a few non-fiction titles thrown in. I'm currently reading a book on the Irish potato famine!

      Delete
  4. I don't understand why Hilary Mantel's books got so much appreciation, when she seemed to be deliberately obnoxious with antecedents. I was constantly looking back to verify the antecedent of "he", because it usually (but not always!) was Cromwell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rick: Yes, that annoys me as well. I've just read a book that constantly refers to he or she rather than naming the person concerned.

      Delete
  5. I don't like open endings either. A cliffhanger will make me stop reading that author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mary: I assume open endings just mean the author was too lazy to think up a proper ending.

      Delete
  6. I'm reading a book that's got a lot of threads and characters - and I am interested in some more than others - when I get a character that I'm not so keen on I leave the book for ages before picking it up again - I'm worried I'll still be reading it this time next year.
    Sx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ms Scarlet: Good luck with finishing the book! A lot of people dislike a book because it has horrible characters, but the point of a book is surely to have interesting characters, be they lovely or utterly vile.

      Delete
  7. As for too many F words, that Maltese Falcon detective (1930) lived in a rough noir world, yet the entire novel avoids swearing. Except in the chapter The Belvedere Divan. In a hotel lobby, Sam Spade asks a young 20 year old who has been tailing him, "Well, where is he?"

    The boy spoke two words, the first a short guttural verb, the second "you."

    "People lose teeth talking like that." Spade's voice was still amiable though his face had become wooden. "If you want to hang around you'll be polite."

    The boy repeated his two words.

    Spade dropped his cigarette into a stone jar by the divan and with a lifted hand caught the attention... (of the hotel detective, who runs the boy out of the place)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sean: "People lose teeth talking like that." I like it! When I was young, the usual swear words were "bloody hell" or "damnation" or "bugger me". A bit more imaginative than the F word.

      Delete
  8. You have made so many valid comments, Nick =, and perhaps you might want to pen a tome yourself?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beatrice: I thought of writing a book when I was young, but I just don't have the necessary skills. So I'll leave writing to the natural writers.

      Delete